Thursday, April 22, 2010

A Little Bill McKibben in Honor of Earth Day



We've built a new earth
It is not as nice as the old one;
It's the greatest mistake humans ever made,
One that we will pay for literally forever.
We live on a new planet.
What happens next is up to us.

 -Bill McKibben

Here is author/activist Bill McKibben reading from his new book Eaarth earlier this month at the Monterey Institute.

 

Note: Video not of the highest quality but the discourse is!

More: 
Bill McKibben's 5 favorite books on nature and the environment

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Campaign expresses enthusiastic support for Bill Gates Sr. and Initiative 1077

A proposed ballot initiative in Washington State would start an income tax for individuals earning more than $200,000 per year and couples earning more than $400,000. The effort to collect signatures has just begun.

Though some indicators seem encouraging, a sober analysis of economic reality tells us the worst is far from over, and may yet begin. We simply must learn from the experience of the last depression and take action to put people back to work. This effort must be well thought out and resources from those who have fared better than most – a fair system of taxation such as Bill Gates Sr. supports – is but one step. I personally applaud Mr. Gates for his sense of decency and the effort he puts forth to do good things. It is important to note here that there are more “cold-hearted” reasons to support this tax as well.

We often forget that Sir John Maynard Keynes, the Father of Modern Economic Theory, did not suggest taxing the wealthy so as to fund jobs programs because he was soft-hearted and felt bad for starving people. Keynes was famous for his contempt for the poor, but he knew as an educated rich man, that if the poor got too poor they would revolt. The New Deal was not a socialist takeover of the government as some today might have us believe, but a compromise with reality that the wealthy simply had to make. Keynes argued correctly, we now know, that taxing the wealthy in a depression is necessary to save capitalism.

Mr. Gates has more noble motives, I believe, but for whatever reason one sees as key we simply must tax the wealthy more to turn the economy around. This is not a tragedy but an opportunity to put vast segments of America back to work rethinking, redesigning, and rebuilding a new economy for the 21st Century. Initiative 1077 will be a significant step forward.


I-1077 website

Monday, April 19, 2010

Weekly Update: Volunteer, Labor Pains, Peace and Democracy

This week was quiet externally for the campaign. We spent a lot of time working on endorsements, which did not go as well as hoped. These took us out of public view but did give me a chance to talk with some people. That is the part of campaigning that is the most rewarding, but also the least involved so far – which is to be expected at the beginning. It is still mostly about organizing and planning at this point.

On the subject of organizing, as we get deeper into details and plans, there arise needs for people who can manage specific outreach projects. To date, we have come up short in terms of the number of volunteers needed – and I know it is tough out there, people just trying to get by, but if you can spare some time on a regular basis to help organizationally let us know. Also, we need people who can attend public events to help with visibility. This is mostly about showing up with buttons and signs at events in order to give visibility to the campaign. I do as many of these as I can and will speak at as many as possible in the next couple of months. It is good to have our people in the crowd – building up the event’s numbers to help a good cause, whatever the cause is, and showing that we support them. And finally, we need someone with a good ten or more hours a week to take on the ! job of volunteer coordinator. This job is currently being shared by two people and needs its own staff. If you are interested, please email Michael at: communications@curtis4senate.org.

We have a lot of buttons, bumperstickers and yard signs now. Send your request to the campaign email. In some cases we might have to ask you to help with postage. I have a special marketing item in the works, but it is still a surprise.

In terms of reflections this week…

As part of the process of being evaluated for state endorsement, I met with the King County Labor Council this week. They were very nice people and I have heard good things about many of them. The curious thing is that it all was a charade. I might have been the only one in the room who knew the extent to which their time was being wasted. Before my interview, I attended a public discussion between the President of the State Labor Council and the State Chair of the Democratic Party. The President of the Sate Labor Council, after detailing the reasons why labor had difficult relations with Democrats and how the Labor Council was going to now make informed decisions and not just carte blanche endorse a Democrat, the President announced to the audience that his number one priority was electing my opponent. He then went on to say that the power to make this decision resides with someone else, a convention mee! ting next month, and later reiterated the impossible (if one expects him to follow the rules) commitment to the incumbent.

The glaring hypocrisy did not occur to him and he did not reply to an email from me explaining that this primary changed things and how he should think more strategically about this. As one of the rank-and-file I find it outrageous that the President of the State Labor Council has illegally (in terms of by-laws) assumed some sort of dictatorial authority to determine endorsements for the whole body. I am insulted personally and on behalf of the KCLC that he would waste our time with the required process when he is just dictating policy instead.

It seems sad that the people most abused by corporate power – working people – can’t rely on our unions to stand up for us. I know some of you reading this are not surprised and wondered why I would be interested in courting unions in the first place. Some think they cause as much trouble as these abusive corporations. Well, I don’t go that far but it seems pretty obvious “Big Labor” is not prepared to think outside the box, and so is part of the problem by default.

What I have really come to understand this week is that for people who are used to the status quo it is difficult to consider challenging or changing it. Generally our elections don’t change the way the system works, they just redistribute power in various small ways over time toward corporations. There are small concessions made to labor, but overall the status quo works for corporations.

It looks like incompetence to me but I don’t know how much is fair to expect of any group caught in this trap. This is my point. The political system works one way and includes one way of doing things and this involves the two parties and “everyone” knows it, so unions relate to it, special interest groups relate to it, non-profits relate to, the whole of society is permeated by a political order that stifles all dissent and as it becomes more corporate oriented becomes more detached from human needs.

The closer someone or some organization is to the two-party system the more likely they are to be frightened at changing it – even if they agree with the direction of the change.

Those who know political philosophy will be shaking their heads about now. Of course that is true – isn’t it what Louis Althusser was saying over half a decade ago? Well, yes it is, but it is a difficult lesson to encounter in person. We expect people who really believe that the country should not illegally invade other countries, for example, will support stopping that – but if they have to challenge the system that exists, and in which they exist, then they will not challenge it. These absurd wars are the most vital issue of the day but the candidates from the two parties won’t even mention it. When you ask why, the only answer to give is Althusser’s.


I always knew this had to be a grassroots campaign, but now I understand that on a deeper level. This is why so many voters are so mad. In our campaign meetings we have talked about the Tea Party Movement, and how we have to reach out to the rank and file of that movement. They are fed up with this same political system that controls things and is unresponsive to individual requests and rights. If you aren’t part of that two-party system in some fashion, then it refuses to acknowledge you, and this happens to people of all manner of political persuasions.


Anyone who thinks of themselves as being primarily committed to democracy, to the principle of equality before the law, and government of laws (constitutionality) is included in those I am trying to represent. We are the majority, as it happens, and so we can decide to not play their game. This is actually happening in a few significant races around the country. We, the people, are ready to be independent. We can run government on rational policy and democratic decision making. It is just not that hard to have honest conversations. We don’t expect that of politicians, but it is what I am about and what I will expect of them.

It is new, and it is different, and that can be scary but it is time for reason and respect for the people to prevail.

The lesson seems to be that we can’t rely on people or organizations that say they believe in peace and democracy, the rule of law and human dignity, we have to do this ourselves and it will be hard. But it can be done! We have to support people who are truly interested in challenging corporate power, and we have to know that this is done by us and not by anyone else, not by the media, not by the existing power in society, but by the collective will of the people. Democracy is a threat to concentrated power and the degree to which we endorse democracy that is the degree to which we are a threat to the status quo.

Most people say the biggest issue today is the economy, and it ought to be! So let’s bring all the troops home and get to work rebuilding our economy, instead of destroying it while we slaughter innocent people the world over. It is a matter of talking to each other. Tell people you know about the campaign. Most people agree with me, with us, on the two big issues: peace and a functioning economy.

The two-party duopoly is a disaster on the economy and senselessly committed to war instead of peaceful coexistence. Tell everyone you know – chances are they agree in principle. The issue is: are they fed up enough yet to shake things up? If they are, then tell them about my web site. If they aren’t, then leave them alone until they are – they will be eventually. We have the power – the power of our vote – we just have to use that power.

People are uncomfortable with new directions and new ways of organizing power, but it is what we all deserve – peace and prosperity.


Have a good week!

Richard

Friday, April 16, 2010

War Numbers: The Cost of War Takes it Toll on Washington State

 Image via World Can't Wait

The taxpayers of Washington State have paid $23.8 billion toward the Iraq and Afghanistan wars since 2001. 

Unfortunately, one can only imagine what good $23.8 billion can do for the people of Washington.

For the same amount of money, the following could have been provided:

3,769,403 People with Health Care for One Year OR
441,658 Public Safety Officers for One year OR
382,782 Music and Arts Teachers for One Year OR
3,089,078 Scholarships for University Students for One Year OR
4,281,295 Students receiving Pell Grants of $5550 OR
131,278 Affordable Housing Units OR
9,583,365 Children with Health Care for One Year OR
2,678,524 Head Start Places for Children for One Year OR
388,572 Elementary School Teachers for One Year OR
21,167,104 Homes with Renewable Electricity for One Year

The United States Census Bureau estimated our state population at 6,664,195 in 2009.

Data via National Priorities Project

More:
Information Clearing House: Your Tax Dollars at War: More Than 53% of Your Tax Payment Goes to the Military
Rethink Afghanistan: War is Not Free

Monday, April 12, 2010

Weekly Update: New blog, Twitter, A Green New Deal, End the Wars, Energy Independence, Power of Hemp

4.11.2010

Dear Supporters (and any casual observers),

This week has been very busy but not very visible. We have a new Communications Director (Michael) and he is already plugging the campaign into the digital world. We had some of the rudimentary pieces in place but now have:

The website: www.richardcurtis4senate.org

A blog: curtis4ussenate.blogspot.com/

A Twitter account: http://twitter.com/Curtis4USsenate

Please subscribe, friend or do whatever you do with these. Email works for me but the world has moved on.

Soon all of these things will be integrated, too! The campaign committee is staffed with people who know campaigns and have serious experience, but Michael knows this digital world of communications and is wonderfully helpful. You have probably already seen a message from Michael concerning my latest press release (the spelling issues are mine, not his, by the way), another dimension to our communications with you all and the public.

I need to remind you all that political campaigns run on money. We are still running in the black but are planning the next print run and a catchy item that we hope will help with outreach (still a secret). So we are going to be spending a few thousand dollars in the next week and could use some help with that. Keep in mind the technical stuff from the FEC: we need your name and address, and if your total donations add up to $200 or more then we also need your occupation, employers name and state; the limit for Primary races is $2,400. You can make donations via the web site or mail (address is at the bottom of this email). Thank you!

Now for this week’s reflection on the world I thought I should reply to all of you who have written asking for specifics. The message I am getting seems to be you all are suitably impressed that I can do social commentary (no stretch there since I have done that for 15 years) but what you want to know is what I intend to do. I am starting with some general discussions and will get more and more specific over time. So here you go.

Well, I think the first thing called for is paying attention to what the American people say concerns them. The biggest issue on polls these days is the economy. Every major economy in the world works on the principles outlined by John Maynard Keynes. There is nothing about modern economics that does not come from Keynes. The New Deal was his idea, well the concept not that name. Capitalism simply is subject to cycles that include depressions. We are in a depression now and there is no point pretending that is not true. We need a new New Deal, but with the environmental troubles we have we need a Green New Deal in particular. I see this involving massive works program that can put American back to work rebuilding the national infrastructure to do what it needs to do but in an environmentally friendly way. This sort of thing needs to be well thought out – we need better ways of doing what we do now and that analysis and new planning is part of the program. I don’t have the specifics of this worked as I would like to have time to consult with a range of experts, but we need to fix our roads and bridges in a way that can accommodate alternatives to single occupant cars, for example. I would be open to any suggestion for works projects that has social utility (the various New Deal programs offer many examples of things to do and then we need to add new ideas as well).

This immediately raises the question of how to pay for such things. One of the most impressive economic minds in the world today, John K. Galbraith, tells us not to be afraid of deficit spending when we are rebuilding the economy. I understand his point but would prefer to do it through the redirection of resources (at this point we can’t balance the budget over night but could over time and still have money for what are called Keynesian Pumps, these works programs). The redirection I have in mind is away from the Pentagon and towards most everything else. We do not need to be the policeman of the world, we do not need to occupy other countries and we certainly do not need 600 bases in other peoples’ countries. The people in uniform doing this today need to be put to work constructing new ways to live, building newer and better transportation systems. Plus, and this needs more discussion, if we just shorten the work week we can put many more people back to work in the civilian economy (this is complicated as wage levels must be protected and inflationary pressures considered too, more later).

Military spending is justified on the notion that the world is dangerous. Perhaps in some ways, but those problems are better handled as police matters than military manners. The countries we occupy are dangerous, but that is to be expected, so we shouldn’t do it. For most of us “Manifest Destiny” refers to a misguided and racist rationalization not an actual duty, so why are we at war? We should immediately withdraw from both Iraq and Afghanistan and use those resources for our economy and society. An occupier has no moral authority and if we want to take seriously our obligation to help the people of these countries then we have to hand the job off to some entity that has moral authority with the people in those places. This is not difficult but that does not mean it will be popular among people who profit from war, especially.

The incumbent keeps voting to spend money on these insane wars. I will not do that. In fact if there is no progress before I take office, after I do I will act to stop the funding using all the powers available to a United States Senator. We have plenty of money to solve national problems, but we have to stop wasting it on illegal occupations if we want a sound economy.

And lastly for today: the environment. I realize some people still think they needn’t worry about global warming but that is just wishful thinking. Every serious scientist in the world who studies these issues and every relevant scientific body in the world all agree. There is no serious scientific debate about the reality of human caused climate change so we must act. People around the world have noticed and are doing what they can. It is inspiring in a way to see such cooperation on a global scale (with some notable exceptions of course). We must lead the way on this, not trail behind.

The way we get and use energy has to change. We simply must find ways to stop relying on fossil fuels. This can be done by putting money into research and development of new technologies. We need to put experts to work on new approaches to transportation, food production, and national self sufficiency. Most immediately we could have programs that loan money for alternative energy production (something the Germans do now with great success), jobs programs for installing solar and wind on the home scale and industrial scale, eliminating tax and other incentives for wasteful/polluting consumption and production and tax incentives for Green alternatives.

One of the fastest ways to make a huge change is to produce industrial hemp. Hemp, a variant of the marijuana plant (which in its industrial form does not have THC), has been around longer than human beings. It is the single most useful plant on Earth, and can be used for plastics, fuel, food, paper, cloth and medicine. Seriously, you can make plastics from it (and other plants too, what makes it workable is the scale at which it can be produced). The Declaration of Independence is written on hemp paper. We can put loggers to work as farmers, mills back to work processing hemp paper and fabric, plastics factories can use hemp based plastics, seeds can be used by as food and topically (hemp oil for skin, shampoo, etc.) and it is medicine for millions of people already and there are a host of potential medical uses yet to be researched.

This one plant can change the planet. We have it and can farm it easily. As Senator I will champion legislation to do this.

That is just a look at some of my main issues. I would like, in the future, to talk about what it means to extend democracy. At present what we are doing is challenging the two-party system to open up electoral space but this is just a part of what it means to have a truly democratic society. I will also discuss economic issues more (like why don’t we ever audit the Federal Reserve?) and other social issues.

Have a good week. Please drop a check in the mail if you can. Thank you!

All the best,

Richard

Sunday, April 11, 2010

Curtis for Senate Campaign Calls for Immediate Arrest of Henry Kissinger for Crimes Against Humanity


With the release of classified documents that shed light on Henry Kissinger’s role in the assassination of Orlando Letelier (former Chilean Foreign Minister) and associate Ronni Moffitt (an American citizen) it is time for justice to be done. From Southeast Asia to Latin America, Henry Kissinger has had a role in propping up military dictatorships, leading death squads, hit squads, and the systematic murder of tens of thousands of people at a time. Kissinger is the most bloodied war criminal alive today. He was directly responsible for the deaths of literally millions of innocent people, crimes for which he has never been brought to justice.

The United States of America cannot claim to be a moral nation, an honorable nation or a nation of laws when the world’s leading war criminal is still working for the government, let alone the fact that he is walking free. It is an insult to his millions of victims and the integrity of the nation that this criminal remains uncharged and untried. Every time he enters the White House it is blood stain on the nation that will take decades to heal.



Car in which Orlando Letelier and Ronni Moffitt were killed by Pinochet's secret police in Washington, D.C.on September 21, 1976.

U.S. Senate Candidate Richard Curtis, PhD (I-WA) strongly and unequivocally calls for the immediate arrest and trial of Henry Kissinger on charges of Conspiracy to Committed Murder (in Washington DC), Crimes Against Humanity (in a variety of countries in Latin America) and War Crimes (in Southeast Asia). As Senator Dr. Curtis pledges to hold hearings on the issue of Kissinger’s criminality if the Justice Department fails to honor its obligations to the nation to protect us and the world from the worst criminals in the world.

Henry Kissinger 'cancelled warning against political assassinations'- Telegraph.co.uk

Declassified Document: Kissinger Blocked U.S. Protest on South American Assassinations -Firedoglake

Friday, April 9, 2010

The Tragedy of Violence Against Police

 Bodies of the 4 slain Lakewood police officers at memorial service

The families of the police officers killed by Maurice Clemmons have announced their intention to sue Pierce County (WA) for damages in the amount of $182 Million.  They say the intention is to force the county to admit wrongdoing and correct its practices that they alleged led to or allowed the tragedy.  The county says it cannot monitor jail inmate phone calls and that the responsibility for the tragedy lies with Clemmons and accomplices.

U.S. Senate candidate, Dr. Richard Curtis, a philosophy professor with expertise in social relations and the nature of human consciousness, wrote to local law enforcement, prosecutors and state legislators before that tragedy happened last year to offer to help them understand what was happening.  Seattle residents will recall that the tragedy with Clemmons was the third in a string of incidents that year.  Only the Seattle Police Department responded and initiated conversations.  The muted response to an offer for free expert consulting help puzzled and then saddened him as further tragedy unfolded.

Dr. Curtis's professional opinion is that both the families and the county are confused about the issue causation.  Yes, Clemmons is responsible for his actions at a very basic level, and yes, the county might have acted differently.  But all of us live in and are shaped by the context of our lives.  One part of that context is a racist and abusive criminal "justice" system that has come to put exclusive emphasis on retribution at the cost of rehabilitation.  Our jails and prisons are places were low level criminals go for training to become higher level criminals, either directly because they have access to information or by default because that is how they are treated by society in and out of jail.

We cannot make reasonable progress on protecting the lives of those who daily risk theirs to keep order in society until we admit the justice system is dysfunctional and irrationally organized.  If we expect people to make their way in society then we have to prepare them, and failing that offer rehabilitative services that make up for that lack of preparation for success.  To not do so and still expect everyone to make their own way is ridiculous, and obviously leads only to disaster.

There is no good reason for those officers to have died.  But let us not forget to notice other details that matter.  It is remarkable that these tragedies don't occur more often given the abusive and racist nature of our justice system.  It is a testament to human adaptability and cooperation that people abused by this system do not react violently more often.  This tragedy is evidence of how cooperative and moral the vast majority of us are by nature.  We tolerate a great deal of abuse (either real or imagined, and both types must be understood and managed) before rage overwhelms our internal control systems.

 Eddie Lee Davis / Douglas Davis / Ricky Hinton. 
All three suspected of helping  alleged cop killer Maurice Clemmons elude police (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)

As Senator Dr. Curtis will introduce legislation to completely re-evaluate the standards used in the justice system to bring them in line with what we know about how human beings actually function and to create systems that can offer services to people who need them both before they get into trouble and after if they do, by putting the emphasis back on rehabilitation.

Our present emphasis on retribution is not consistent with our social values as a democratic society (let alone the social values of the monotheistic traditions that inspire so many of us), it is not consistent with what modern science now knows about human beings, and it is deeply immoral.  Dr. Curtis's heart goes out to all those caught up in these tragedies and vows to do what he can to create social systems that can prevent, not just react to tragedy.

Related News
Families of slain Lakewood officers plan to file $182 million in claims against county - Seattle Times

Say it ain't so, Lakewood police survivors Editorial in Tacoma News Tribune